Prediction of Nathan Healey vs John-Paul Fruttero Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
N. Healey vs J. Fruttero

Nathan Healey

AUS

3

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

5'11" (180 cm)

Height

6'1" (185 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

159

Best Rank

183

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$111.2K

Career Money

$8.3K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

John-Paul Fruttero

USA

3

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

5'11" (180 cm)

Height

6'1" (185 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

159

Best Rank

183

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$111.2K

Career Money

$8.3K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Healey 3 - 1 Fruttero

They have played 10 sets in total, with Nathan Healey winning 6 and John-Paul Fruttero winning 4. The last match between Nathan Healey and John-Paul Fruttero was at the Kia International In Caloundra - Caloundra, 14-11-2006, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Nathan Healey getting the victory 6-2 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Healey	3
Fruttero	1

Last 4 H2H Matches:

(R1) Kia International In Caloundra - Caloundra(11-14-06)

Stats

Nathan Healey

John-Paul Fruttero

(R2) XII Trofeo Ciudad de Quito 'Diario El Comercio' - Quito(10-04-06)

Stats

Nathan Healey

John-Paul Fruttero

(Q1) The Stella Artois Championships - London(06-10-06)

Stats

John-Paul Fruttero

Nathan Healey

N. Healey vs J. Fruttero H2H Profile

N. Healey	Stats	J. Fruttero
$111,195	Career Prize Money	$8,325
52.89% (183-163)	Career Total W/L	50.00% (176-176)
1	Clay	0
0	Grass	1
2	Hard	0
3	Titles	2
3	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

N. Healey vs J. Fruttero Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nathan Healey has won 0% of points on their second serve, while John-Paul Fruttero has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nathan Healey, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while John-Paul Fruttero has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Nathan Healey has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas John-Paul Fruttero has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Nathan Healey has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with John-Paul Fruttero winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Nathan Healey has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 62% (W/L 36/22), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 22/28). John-Paul Fruttero has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 22/17), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 36% (W/L 4/7).
Player level: In the last year, Nathan Healey has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as John-Paul Fruttero has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Nathan Healey winning 3 times and John-Paul Fruttero being victorious 1 times. They have played 10 sets in total, with Nathan Healey winning 6 and John-Paul Fruttero winning 4.
The last match between Nathan Healey and John-Paul Fruttero was at the Kia International In Caloundra - Caloundra, 14-11-2006, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Nathan Healey getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nathan Healey has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while John-Paul Fruttero has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nathan Healey has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while John-Paul Fruttero has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Nathan Healey has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and John-Paul Fruttero has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Nathan Healey vs John-Paul Fruttero Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

N. Healey vs J. Fruttero H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

N. Healey	Stats	J. Fruttero
3	H2H Matches Won	1
6	Sets Won	4
58	Games Won	51
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
75% (3/4)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	25% (1/4)
100% (2/2)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/2)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	50% (1/2)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	50% (1/2)
50% (1/2)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

N. Healey Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Usa F12 - 08-06-2009
R1 Lester CookL. Cook	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
Yuba City Challenger - 01-06-2009
Q1 Tim SmyczekT. Smyczek	L	6-4 6-1	Stats
Ford Tennis Championships - Louisville - 27-10-2008
Q1 Shane CollinsS. Collins	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
Q2 Ryan SweetingR. Sweeting	L	6-3 7-6(1)	Stats
The Mercedes Benz of Calabasas - Calabasas - 13-10-2008
Q1 Amir WeintraubA. Weintraub	W	6-1 6-2	Stats

View All

J. Fruttero Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Baotou Challenger - 26-08-2019
R1 Runhao HuaR. Hua	L	7-5 6-2	Stats
Yokkaichi Challenger - 05-08-2019
R1 Toshihide MatsuiT. Matsui	L	6-3 7-6(13)	Stats
Binghamton Challenger - 22-07-2019
R2 Alejandro TabiloA. Tabilo	L	6-3 7-5	Stats
Noumea Challenger - 01-01-2019
Q3 Sem VerbeekS. Verbeek	L	6-4 6-1	Stats
Chengdu Challenger - 01-08-2016
Q1 Xin GaoX. Gao	L	6-3 3-6 7-6(6)	Stats

View All

N. Healey vs J. Fruttero Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

N. Healey	Stats	J. Fruttero
52.89% (183/163)	YTD Win/Loss	50.00% (176/176)
53.31% (435/381)	Sets Win/Loss	50.67% (417/406)
51.67% (4091/3827)	Games Win/Loss	51.22% (4085/3890)
53.99% (115/98)	Hard Win/Loss	50.87% (147/142)
44.00% (22/28)	Clay Win/Loss	36.36% (4/7)
40.00% (10/15)	Indoor Hard W/L	50.00% (22/22)
62.07% (36/22)	Grass Win/Loss	37.50% (3/5)
0.05	Aces Per Game	0.02
208	Aces Total	89
0.05	Double Faults Per Game	0.01
196	Total Double Faults	58
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
493.14	Average Opponent Rank	488.48
58% (1370/2374)	1st Serve %	59% (639/1079)
72% (988/1370)	1st Serve Win %	69% (441/639)
48% (479/996)	2nd Serve Win %	48% (214/442)
34% (70/204)	Break Points Won % (Total)	43% (24/56)
35% (804/2296)	Return Points Win %	32% (315/975)
50.00% (11/11)	Slam W/L	33.33% (2/4)
25.00% (1/3)	Masters W/L	0.00% (0/2)
0.00% (0/1)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
44.78% (30/37)	Main Tour W/L	41.94% (13/18)
52.04% (102/94)	Challenger W/L	49.54% (108/110)
69.64% (39/17)	Futures W/L	55.79% (53/42)
54% (176/327)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	50% (173/348)
27% (3/11)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	100% (1/1)
44% (63/143)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	49% (61/124)
44% (51/117)	Deciding Set Win %	45% (54/121)
82% (192/157)	1st Set Won, Won Match	78% (185/144)
18% (192/35)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	22% (185/40)
16% (154/25)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	19% (167/31)